Some producers using public domain and fair use materials
wonder what attribution they are required to give to the creators of those
works, whether they must identify the works as being public domain or fair use,
and what other rules they must follow when using such works.
copyright in the work has expired or never existed), copyright law places no
obligation on you to refer to the work as public domain, to cite the source,
or to provide any other type of credit. Likewise,
if your use of the material qualifies as a fair use (here I’m referring to fair
use as defined under Section 107 of the Copyright Act), copyright law places no
obligation on you to indicate that you’re relying on fair use, to cite the
source, or to provide any other type of credit.
and/or provide a credit. Also, depending
on your professional field, your colleagues may take a dim view of your quoting
sources and using materials without providing an appropriate credit.
at least one caveat to providing credit when you are relying on fair use. Your claim that your use is protected by
copyright fair use is not a guarantee that the rights
owner will agree with you. There is no
bright line in determining what qualifies as a fair use and what doesn’t. That’s why the decision of whether to use a
particular copyrighted work without permission often revolves around a risk
assessment. One of the risk factors to consider is the
likelihood of the use coming to the attention of the rights owner. Putting in a credit increases the likelihood
that the rights owner will become aware of your use.
Because fair use is
uncertain, it’s typically my preference to have permission rather than rely on
fair use. If you have permission from
the rights owner, you have a license from the rights owner to use the work in a
particular manner. If the rights owner
dictates a specific form of credit, I would characterize that specification as
a term of the license agreement and I would do my best to comply.